Anderson Investigative Associates — Navbar
Over a few months our focus has been on procedural justice and science-based interviewing practices. We have focused on specific issues, but the key is getting these practices into the able hands of interviewers. Today, I will dive into essential communication skills and their inextricable connection to effective interviewing. This is another issue that if addressed will improve your interviewing performance but will have an equal if not larger effect on your entire life.
Science-Based Interviewing

The Unseen Engine: Communication Skills as the Core of Science-Based Investigative Interviewing

Beneath every evidence disclosure strategy and cognitive load technique sits a foundation that’s rarely taught and never optional: communication itself.

Mark Anderson 9 min read

Over the past few months, our focus has been on procedural justice and science-based interviewing practices. We’ve dug into specific issues, but the key is getting these practices into the able hands of interviewers. Today, I’m diving into essential communication skills and their inextricable connection to effective interviewing. This is another issue that, if addressed, will improve your interviewing performance — and will have an equal, if not larger, effect on your entire life.

This topic again requires some honest self-reflection: an evaluation of your approach to executing the most productive interview possible, and of how you evaluate situations across the landscape of your life.

As always, there are a couple of foundational concepts to consider. What is your organizational mission? Are you in the interview to get the greatest quantity and quality of truthful information? If the number one reason interviewees tell us the truth is the confidence and credibility of the interviewer, what does using legacy and outdated practices with no evidential support actually produce? The result is the antithesis of our organizational mission and goals. Stop stepping on progress, and implement the best practices available.

When we talk about science-based investigative interviewing, we often spotlight evidence disclosure strategies, cognitive load techniques, and procedural fairness. But beneath all these structured methods lies a foundation that is often overlooked and notoriously difficult to teach — communication skills. These so-called “soft skills” aren’t just helpful; they are indispensable. They make the difference between compliance and cooperation, between resistance and rapport, and ultimately between an interview that extracts facts and one that builds understanding and credibility.

Why Communication Is the Core, Not the Accessory

Research has long shown that the success of investigative interviews — especially those grounded in ethical, science-based frameworks — rests on rapport, credibility, and interpersonal connection. These outcomes are not byproducts of asking the right questions alone; they are built through how those questions are asked, and more importantly, how the conversation is managed moment to moment.

Let’s examine how twelve high-performance communication skills play a role in the science-based interview process.

  1. Active Listening. Without this, there is no rapport. Investigators must listen not only for facts but also for the emotions, inconsistencies, and gaps that offer insight into motivation or deception. Active listening also shows respect — an ethical cornerstone of the investigative process.
  2. Clarity and Conciseness. Clear, jargon-free language reduces cognitive load on the interviewee and prevents misunderstandings. Precision in question formulation is a science-based practice, and this clarity directly impacts the accuracy and usefulness of responses.
  3. Nonverbal Communication. Interviewers need to be aware of the elements of nonverbal communication, as well as their own. Open posture, appropriate eye contact, and a calm demeanor reinforce trustworthiness — especially important when engaging reluctant or vulnerable subjects.
  4. Empathy. Empathy, not sympathy, is key. It communicates that the interviewer values the subject’s humanity and is not adversarial. This promotes disclosure without compromising investigative goals.
  5. Adaptability. No two interviews are ever the same. Interviewers must read the room and adjust tone, pacing, and approach depending on the subject’s demeanor, culture, or cognitive state. Rigidity is the enemy of science-based interviewing.
  6. Confidence. Confidence breeds credibility. Uncertain delivery can trigger defensiveness or suspicion. Interviewers must speak with measured assurance, projecting fairness and control without arrogance.
  7. Constructive Feedback. Feedback loops help interviewers refine their approach in real time and reflect post-interview. Receiving feedback well is just as important — science-based training relies on continuous learning and improvement.
  8. Persuasiveness. Persuasiveness is ethical influence. It’s about guiding someone toward cooperation by framing the benefits of honesty or clarifying misconceptions — never through coercion or manipulation.
  9. Open-Mindedness. Science-based interviewers must set aside bias. Preconceived notions blind us to the truth. Open-mindedness promotes objectivity, a hallmark of both ethical practice and investigative accuracy.
  10. Conflict Resolution. Tensions are inevitable. Effective interviewers de-escalate, diffuse, and redirect. Maintaining a cooperative environment often hinges on resolving interpersonal friction in the moment — and doing so keeps the conversation going.
  11. Storytelling. A surprising but vital skill. Storytelling helps explain processes, illustrate consequences, and normalize cooperation. It’s also key to framing disclosures in ways that make them easier for subjects to understand and relate to.
  12. Cultural Awareness. Cultural missteps can destroy rapport instantly. Science-based practices must be grounded in respect for diversity, with communication strategies that reflect cultural humility and awareness.

The Hardest Skills to Teach — and the Most Necessary

Many of these skills fall into the category of “you know it when you see it.” That makes them hard to measure and even harder to teach. Yet their absence is always felt. A mechanically correct interview with no warmth, curiosity, or interpersonal dexterity fails in the field. The subject shuts down. The data dries up. The interview fails.

That’s why science-based interviewing programs must go beyond scripts and models. They must immerse interviewers in reflective practice, structured feedback, and scenario-based training that fosters the soft skills at the heart of human communication.

Final Thoughts: The New Standard

The future of investigative interviewing lies not just in knowing what works, but in becoming the kind of communicator who can make it work.

Communication is not the art that softens the science — it is the science. — Why soft skills are the hardest requirement, not the optional one

And when done right, it transforms an interview into an ethical, effective pursuit of truth.

These science-based practices must be fully implemented in your interview approach. Please reflect: are you employing these practices? If not, why not? Ask yourself why you are doing what you are doing. Do you have any proof that supports your legacy practices and the outcomes they produce? Is your approach maximizing the quality and quantity of truthful information obtained? It is time to change — and the changes needed are fundamental, but they can be accomplished in a timely and effective manner.

Training is essential. It is what moved me beyond my blind spots, at least some of them. I can provide the training or recommend providers teaching science-based practices. Do your research, find the right provider, and maximize your training dollar investment. If you are a practitioner or a leader, don’t settle for the same old legacy-based methods that have no empirical evidence supporting them. If you are in leadership, you carry an even greater responsibility to know and apply these standards and to find training content that maximizes your team’s effectiveness and accomplishes your mission.

Anderson Investigative Associates is positioned to custom-tailor training to your specific needs. If you have any questions or would like to discuss communication skills and their connection to effective interviewing, please reach out. Additional issues pertaining to interviewing, auditing, and investigations can be found in other blogs and videos that I have produced and that are contained in most blocks of instruction our company presents.

If you have additional questions, comments, or an interview topic you’d like me to address, just let me know. In the meantime, be well, stay safe out there, and master your communication skills — and their connection to effective interviewing — in your interview preparation and in every area of your life. It’s time to improve your interviewing and communication skills, not just in interviews, but throughout your life. If you need help getting ready, I know who could help.

Recommended Science-Based References

  • Alison, L., & Alison, E. (2020). The Science of Rapport-Based Interviewing: A Framework for Effective Interviewing. Oxford University Press.
  • Meissner, C. A., Kelly, C. E., & Woestehoff, S. A. (2015). Improving the effectiveness of suspect interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11(1), 211–233.
  • Vanderhallen, M., Vervaeke, G., & Holmberg, U. (2011). Witness and suspect interrogation: A review of research and practice. In T. Williamson, B. Milne, & S. Savage (Eds.), International Developments in Investigative Interviewing. Willan.
  • Russano, M. B., Narchet, F. M., & Meissner, C. A. (2010). Investigative interviewing and the detection of deception. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police Interrogations and False Confessions. American Psychological Association.
  • Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). National Evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course. Home Office Research Study.
  • Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S. Å. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(1–2), 31–45.
Communication Skills Rapport-Based Interviewing Science-Based Interviewing

Mark A. Anderson

Director of Training and Development at Anderson Investigative Associates, where he provides training on interview planning, Cognitive Interview techniques, Strategic Use of Evidence, and other science-based interviewing methods.